Checking theory and grammatical functions in universal grammar

By H. Ura. 2000

226 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3d779bb9f0418be0b58e0774df6d1685d772bf6d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

The English dative alternation: The case for verb sensitivity1 (2008, background): “As noted by Goldberg (1997) and Pinker (1989), give lexicalizes caused possession and nothing more; therefore, its root does not contribute anything beyond what is already encoded in the caused possession event schema.”
Lexical Case, Inherent Case, and Argument Structure (2006, background): “Similarly, ergative Case has also sometimes been characterized as a structural Case (Wunderlich 1997, Ura 2000, Davison 2004), although this conclusion is also not supported by reliable diagnostic tests.”
Agreement, dislocation, and partial configurationality (2003, unknown): “Similar reversal constructions have been analyzed in other Bantu languages, including Kinyarwanda (Kimenyi 1980; Ura 2000), Kilega (Kinyalolo 1991) and Kirundi (Ndayiragije 1999).”
Multiple Verb Movement in Hoan (2002, background): “Other parameters in this family yield languages with multiple nominative (Ura 2000), multiple accusative, multiple genitive, and multiple whquestions (Bošković 1999).6 5 Carstens (2001) provides interesting evidence that there are vP projections sandwiched between V1 and V2.”
On Dependent Ergative Case (in Shipibo) and Its Derivation by Phase (2014, background): “This line of attack was especially prevalent in early Minimalist works, including Campana 1992, Murasugi 1992, and Bobaljik 1993, and continued in Ura 2000 and Otsuka 2006.”
Asymmetries in Scrambling and Cyclic Linearization (2007, background): “When multiple scrambling is triggered by one head, elements move to multiple specifiers of the triggering head (Ura 1996, 2000, Richards 1997, 2001).”
Binding of Indeterminate Pronouns and Clause Structure in Japanese (2001, background): “A key to the answer lies in the fact that in Japanese nominative phrases are licensed by tense (see, e.g., Shibatani 1977, Takezawa 1987, Ura 2000).”