Impact of community forestry policy on rural livelihoods and food security in Nepal.

By Y. Malla. 2000

181 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3d7587867e2a25a33c8bf2bfbd843309bab9d89d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Poverty, property rights and collective action: understanding the distributive aspects of common property resource management (2005, background): “…physical stocks of trees and other resources on both public and private lands have been evident (Branney et al., 1994), equitable use of forests products, such as fuel wood, fodder, timber, and other non-timber forest products within the community, has not been clearly demonstrated (Malla, 2000).”
Role of non-timber forest products in sustaining forest-based livelihoods and rural households' resilience capacity in and around protected area: a Bangladesh study† (2015, background): “…of NTFPs in local, forest-reliant livelihoods in some tropical developing countries (see, for example, Malhotra et al. 1991; Ganesan1993; Gunatilleke, Senaratne, and Abeygunawardena 1993; Townson 1995; Cavendish 2000; Malla 2000; Mallik 2000; Ambrose-Oji 2003; Mahapatra, Albers, and Robinson 2005).”
A new agenda for forest conservation and poverty alleviation: making markets work for low-income producers (2004, background): “is derived from the sale of non-wood forest products (Malla 2000).”
New Rights for Forest-Based Communities? Understanding Processes of Forest Tenure Reform (2010, background): “…earlier, Nepal was also one of the first countries to develop progressive community forestry policies giving greater rights to local people, and thus its programmes have a longer history and greater maturity (see Acharya 2002, Arnold and Campbell 1985, Gilmour and Fisher 1991, Malla 2000).”
Livelihoods, forests, and conservation in developing countries: an overview (2005, background): “While there have been some positive outcomes in community and social forestry (Antinori & Bray, in this issue; Fomete & Vermaat, 2001), there have been many failures (e.g., Malla, 2000; Mekonnen, 2000).”