Validation and comparison of ActiGraph activity monitors.
By J. Sasaki, D. John, Patty S. Freedson. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 2011
1,243 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Complementary and alternative medicine, Genetics, Physiology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3d5c775a8822a050301fdd884f6a7bb9c7fca52e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Complementary and alternative medicine
In Genetics
In Physiology
Citations in the corpus
- Systematic review of the validity and reliability of consumer-wearable activity trackers (2015, methodology): “The criterion measures for energy expenditure assessed in kilocalories was indirect calorimetry [15, 29, 34, 35, 39, 40, 45], direct calorimetry [31], accelerometry (ActiGraph GT3X+ with a conversion equation [50] to estimate kilocalories [35] and BodyMedia SenseWear [33]), and self-reported data us”
- Accelerometer Data Collection and Processing Criteria to Assess Physical Activity and Other Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Practical Considerations (2017, positive): “GT3X records accelerations at a sampling frequency of 30 Hz However, with the release of GT3X?, the manufacturer allowed users to select the sampling frequency between 30 and 100 Hz Brønd and Arvidsson [46] demonstrated that sampling frequency had an effect on activity counts (i.e., a difference Tab”
- ACTIGRAPH AND ACTICAL PHYSICAL ACTIVITY MONITORS: A PEEK UNDER THE HOOD (2012, background): “This problem was particularly evident at the speed that marked the transition from walking to running (3).”