Correctors for the homogenization of Hamilton‐Jacobi equations in the stationary ergodic setting

By Pierre-Louis Lions, Panagiotis E. Souganidis. 2003

140 citations recorded by the source corpus.

There has recently been considerable interest in issues related to the homogenization of fully nonlinear first-order partial differential equations (HamiltonJacobi equations). This interest stems mainly from the wide spectrum of applications requiring the homogenization (averaging) of Hamilton-Jacobi equations. These applications range from front propagation in random media [5] to turbulentreaction diffusion equations and combustion [28], ergodic properties of controlled dynamical systems [1, 2], averaging behavior of Hamiltonian systems [16, 17], and the connection with the long-time asymptotics of Hamilton-Jacobi equations [6, 7, 18, 19, 20, 32], and stochastic homogenization [31, 33]. The most important step in the analysis of the homogenization problem is, of course, the identification of the effective (averaged) Hamiltonian, which is usually accomplished by studying the cell problem, an auxiliary equation arising in the formal expansion. The cell problem can be thought as a nonlinear eigenvalue problem with the effective Hamiltonian and the solution or approximate solution playing, respectively, the roles of the eigenvalue and the eigenfunction or approximate eigenfunction. It is also expected that the fine properties of the corrector may help to obtain more precise information about the averaged (effective) Hamiltonian. The question of the existence or nonexistence of an exact or approximate corrector appears to be rather delicate if one moves away from the periodic setting. Although the existence of an approximate corrector has been established in the almost-periodic setting for general Hamiltonians by Ishii [23], and the effective Hamiltonian has been identified by one of the authors [33] in the stationary ergodic setting and for convex Hamiltonians (see also [31]), not much is known about the existence of an exact corrector. Indeed, the classical arguments, which yield the existence of correctors in the periodic setting, fail, even in the simple quasi-periodic setting, due to the lack of compactness.

Subfields: Computational Theory and Mathematics, Control and Systems Engineering, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3d5859b6de8d0d25ff92183847984e3556b85b90

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computational Theory and Mathematics

  1. Panagiotis E. Souganidis
  2. S. Armstrong
  3. Russell W. Schwab
  4. Bruno Ziliotto
  5. Björn Engquist
  6. Pierre-Louis Lions
  7. Luis Caffarelli
  8. Pierre Cardaliaguet

In Control and Systems Engineering

  1. Russell W. Schwab
  2. Panagiotis E. Souganidis
  3. Pierre-Louis Lions
  4. Björn Engquist
  5. Luis Caffarelli
  6. S. Armstrong
  7. Lihe Wang
  8. Bruno Ziliotto

In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

  1. Panagiotis E. Souganidis
  2. Russell W. Schwab
  3. S. Armstrong
  4. Guy Barles
  5. Pierre-Louis Lions
  6. Andrea Davini
  7. Björn Engquist
  8. Luis Caffarelli

Citations in the corpus