η and λ deformations as E-models
By C. Klimčík. 2015
138 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Abstract We show that the so-called λ deformed σ-model as well as the η deformed one belong to a class of the E -models introduced in the context of the Poisson–Lie-T-duality. The λ and η theories differ solely by the choice of the Drinfeld double; for the λ model the double is the direct product G × G while for the η model it is the complexified group G C . As a consequence of this picture, we prove for any G that the target space geometries of the λ-model and of the Poisson–Lie T-dual of the η-model are related by a simple analytic continuation.
Subfields: Algebra and Number Theory, Mathematical Physics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3d577bb8169adbacb05cae666de019308c39efad
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Algebra and Number Theory
In Mathematical Physics
In Nuclear and High Energy Physics
Citations in the corpus
- Abelian Yang–Baxter deformations and TsT transformations (2016, background): “1 These models are related to another type of integrable deformation known as the λ model [12, 13, 14] by analytic continuation and Poisson-Lie duality [15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20], see also [21].”
- Scale invariance of the η-deformed AdS5 × S5 superstring, T-duality and modified type II equations (2015, background): “26 Thus if the classical Poisson-Lie duality relation [25] between the η-model and λ-model [26, 12] extends to the full quantum level there may be a way to associate a string theory to the ABF background.”
- Target space supergeometry of η and λ-deformed strings (2016, background): “two deformations are closely related; in fact, in both cases the original symmetry algebra gets q-deformed [14, 15] (with q real and root of unity respectively), and the two models are related, at least at the classical level, by the Poisson-Lie T-duality of [16, 17], see [18, 19, 20].”