Sedimentary eDNA provides different information on timescale and fish species composition compared with aqueous eDNA

By Masayuki K. Sakata, Satoshi Yamamoto, Ryo O. Gotoh, M. Miya, H. Yamanaka, Toshifumi Minamoto. Environmental DNA, 2020

131 citations recorded by the source corpus.

eDNA provides different information on timescale and fish species composition compared with aqueous eDNA Abstract Aqueous environmental DNA (eDNA) analysis has been applied to the monitoring of various ecosystems and taxa, and the characteristics of aqueous eDNA have been previously studied. In contrast, although sedimentary eDNA has been used to restore past information, the characteristics of sedimentary eDNA are not well understood. In this study, we compared the properties of sedimentary and aqueous eDNA of macro-organisms. First, to clarify the preservation ability of sediments, we compared the difference in decay rates

Subfields: Ecology, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3d34ea6912fd4daada9f27881d6c2d4efb632305

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. M. Miya
2. Ryo O. Gotoh
3. T. Sado

In Molecular Biology

1. T. Sado
2. M. Miya
3. Ryo O. Gotoh

Citations in the corpus

• MiFish metabarcoding: a high-throughput approach for simultaneous detection of multiple fish species from environmental DNA and other samples (2020, background): “2019) and lentic (Sato et al. 2017; Fujii et al. 2019; Hayami et al. 2020; Sakata et al. 2020) freshwater environments (flowing and still water, respectively).”