A comparative approach to understanding factors limiting abundance patterns and distributions in a fig tree–fig wasp mutualism

By M. Warren, Mark P. Robertson, J. M. Greeff. 2010

268 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3d2be178c6122301d042fe3dd9d1fb55e8c1acc5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. Sunil Kumar
2. Harald Schneider
3. R. Erkens
4. W. Yee
5. Lisa G. Neven

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. Sunil Kumar
2. Harald Schneider
3. W. Yee
4. Lisa G. Neven

In Plant Science

1. Sunil Kumar
2. Harald Schneider
3. R. Erkens
4. W. Yee
5. Lisa G. Neven

Citations in the corpus

• Evaluating correlative and mechanistic niche models for assessing the risk of pest establishment (2014, methodology): “ENMTools: a toolbox for comparative studies of environmental niche models.”
• Sampling bias in geographic and environmental space and its effect on the predictive power of species distribution models (2012, methodology): “We used ENMTools 1.3 (Warren et al., 2010) to estimate the inverse concentration metric scaled so that 0 is the minimal and 1 is the maximal niche breadth across the study area.”