Attacking software-defined networks: a first feasibility study

By Seungwon Shin, Guofei Gu. HotSDN '13, 2013

364 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Software-Defined Networking (SDN) and Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) Attacks in Cloud Computing Environments: A Survey, Some Research Issues, and Challenges (2016, methodology): “To demonstrate the feasibility of DDoS attacks, a new SDN network scanning prototype tool (named SDN scanner) is proposed in [90] to remotely fingerprint networks that deploy SDN.”
Security in Software Defined Networks: A Survey (2015, neutral): “Besides saturation of the control plane, it is demonstrated in [41] that a network can be compromised by exhausting re-”
Security for 5G and Beyond (2019, methodology): “Regarding controller visibility, a DoS attack is demonstrated in [199] that uses the control-data plane separation logic to”
A Deep Learning Based DDoS Detection System in Software-Defined Networking (SDN) (2016, background): “In this second kind of attack, adversaries fingerprint an SDN for flow installation rules and then send new traffic flows, resulting in flow tablemisses in the switch [32].”
Mobile Edge Computing: A Survey (2018, background): “SDN are an innovation to computer networking that separates control layer and the data layer [65].”
Poisoning Network Visibility in Software-Defined Networks: New Attacks and Countermeasures (2015, background): “SDN Scanner [29] and Avant-Guard [31] show a new attack (which is called data-to-control plane saturation attack) against SDN networks and provide solutions to prevent such attacks.”