Towards a Visual Turing Challenge

By Mateusz Malinowski, Mario Fritz. 2014

74 citations recorded by the source corpus.

As language and visual understanding by machines progresses rapidly, we are observing an increasing interest in holistic architectures that tightly interlink both modalities in a joint learning and inference process. This trend has allowed the community to progress towards more challenging and open tasks and refueled the hope at achieving the old AI dream of building machines that could pass a turing test in open domains. In order to steadily make progress towards this goal, we realize that quantifying performance becomes increasingly difficult. Therefore we ask how we can precisely define such challenges and how we can evaluate different algorithms on this open tasks? In this paper, we summarize and discuss such challenges as well as try to give answers where appropriate options are available in the literature. We exemplify some of the solutions on a recently presented dataset of question-answering task based on real-world indoor images that establishes a visual turing challenge. Finally, we argue despite the success of unique ground-truth annotation, we likely have to step away from carefully curated dataset and rather rely on 'social consensus' as the main driving force to create suitable benchmarks. Providing coverage in this inherently ambiguous output space is an emerging challenge that we face in order to make quantifiable progress in this area.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Evaluation & Benchmarks

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Devi Parikh
  2. Christopher Kanan
  3. Mohit Bansal
  4. Trevor Darrell
  5. Anton van den Hengel
  6. Chunhua Shen
  7. Qi Wu
  8. Dacheng Tao

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

  1. Luc Van Gool
  2. Xiaogang Wang
  3. Dacheng Tao
  4. Trevor Darrell
  5. Chunhua Shen
  6. Jitendra Malik
  7. Andrew Zisserman
  8. Ming-Hsuan Yang

In Evaluation & Benchmarks

  1. Anton van den Hengel
  2. Marcus Rohrbach
  3. Chunhua Shen
  4. Abhinav Kumar Gupta
  5. Qi Wu
  6. Damien Teney
  7. Devi Parikh
  8. Xinlei Chen

Citations in the corpus