Foreign direct investment and growth in India: a cointegration approach

By Chandan Chakraborty, Parantap Basu. 2002

383 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Finance

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3d1e51adeb9be19ef8fed5dc367e9808a8966f72

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Finance

Citations in the corpus

Economic Growth and FDI in Asia: A Panel-Data Approach (2011, background): “…and foreign investment are introduced in the growth regression. using co-integration and an error-correction model to examine the link between FDI and economic growth in India, chakraborty and Basu (2002) suggest that GDP in India is not caused by FDI, and the causality runs more from GDP to FDI.”
Foreign direct investment, pollution and economic growth: evidence from Malaysia (2009, methodology): “…tests to determine the direction of causality in one of these connections, for instance, FDI and pollution: Hoffmann et al. (2005); FDI and economic growth: Ericsson and Irandoust (2001), Chakraborty and Basu (2002) and Liu et al. (2002); pollution and economic growth: Coondoo and Dinda (2002).”
The 45 years of foreign direct investment research: Approaches, advances and analytical areas (2017, neutral): “: Alguacil, Cuadros, and Orts (2002), Baharumshah and Thanoon (2006), Balasubramanyam, Salisu, and Sapsford (1996, 1999), Borensztein et al. (1998), Chakraborty and Basu (2002), Liu, Burridge, and Sinclair (2002).”
Manufacturing FDI and economic growth: evidence from Asian economies (2003, background): “Chakraborty and Basu ( 2002 ) argue that based on a time-series study, FDI does not Granger cause GDP in India.”
Foreign Direct Investment - Growth Nexus: A Review of the Recent Literature (2008, neutral): “…(2001) Positive but weak Lensink and Morrissey (2001) 115 countries 1975- 98 Positive Reisen and Soto (2001) 44 countries 1986- 97 Positive Carkovic and Levine (2002, 2005) 72 countries 1960- 1995 No effect Chakraborty and Basu (2002) India 1974- 96 Causality runs from real GDP to FDI.”
Nexus between foreign direct investment and economic growth in Bangladesh: an augmented autoregressive distributed lag bounds testing approach (2020, background): “Therefore, the direction of this relationship between FDI and economic growth needs to be stressed because the FDI-related spillover effect of knowledge encourages economic growth, which, in turn, attracts more FDI (Chakraborty and Basu 2006).”
Financial development and the FDI-growth nexus: the Malaysian experience (2009, result): “growth causes FDI growth in the long-run but no feedback relationship is observed, corroborating the results of Chakraborty and Basu (2002) for the Indian experience and Shan (2002) for the Chinese”
On economic growth, FDI and exports in China (2006, background): “Many recent studies suggest that market size, labour cost, location and timing are important determinants of FDI (Chakraborty and Basu, 2002; Deichemann et al., 2003; Filippaios et al., 2003).”
Is foreign direct investment good for growth? Evidence from sectoral analysis of China and Vietnam (2008, background): “In contrast, Chakraborty and Basu (2002) find that GDP growth in India is not influenced by FDI.”
Impact of FDI on GDP: A Comparative Study of China and India (2011, background): “India, meanwhile, overtook the United States to claim the survey’s second spot as the U.S. economy continues to struggle.”