Climate-change impacts on understorey bamboo species and giant pandas in China’s Qinling Mountains

By Mao-Ning Tuanmu, Andrés Viña, J. Winkler, Yu Li, Weihua Xu, Zhiyun Ouyang, Jianguo Liu. 2013

162 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3d1672edc888c1ac1d3c96a2567a1180fc4e4a4a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

1. Wei Wei
2. Zejun Zhang
3. Y. Nie
4. James J. Elser
5. F. Wei
6. Ming Xu
7. Renqiang Li
8. Dianmo Li

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. M. Owen
2. James J. Elser
3. David Raubenheimer
4. Stuart Pimm
5. J. Belmaker
6. R. Swaisgood
7. F. Wei
8. Stephen J. Simpson

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. James J. Elser
2. Wei Wei
3. Zejun Zhang
4. F. Wei
5. Y. Nie
6. Ming Xu
7. Renqiang Li
8. Dianmo Li

Citations in the corpus

• Climate change challenges the current conservation strategy for the giant panda. (2015, background): “Bamboo may not be able to keep pace with the giant panda in response to climate change at the same velocity as they move in higher elevations or latitudes (Liu and Viña, 2014; Tuanmu et al., 2013).”
• Obligate herbivory in an ancestrally carnivorous lineage: the giant panda and bamboo from the perspective of nutritional geometry (2015, background): “Such nutritional challenges may grow worse under ongoing climate change that shifts the range, timing and physiological conditions of forage plants (Tuanmu et al. 2012).”
• Climate change‐induced decline in bamboo habitats and species diversity: implications for giant panda conservation (2015, methodology): “To interpret these ensembled forecasts of occurrence probability to presence–absence distribution maps for each bamboo species, we defined the average threshold with a value corresponding to a 10% omission error (Tuanmu et al., 2013).”
• Climate Change Threatens Giant Panda Protection in the 21st Century (2015, background): “, 2014) and food supplies (Tuanmu et al., 2013) in panda reserves, jeopardizing their effectiveness to safeguard giant panda populations in the future.”
• Empirical Evidence for the Scale Dependence of Biotic Interactions (2015, background): “If, however, biotic interactions remain important across grain sizes, changes in one species may initiate cascading effects on many other species (Van der Putten et al., 2010; Kissling et al., 2012; Zarnetske et al., 2012; Tuanmu et al., 2013; Wisz et al., 2013).”
• Giant panda distributional and habitat‐use shifts in a changing landscape (2018, background): “A number of climate change models project substantive impacts on pandas’ primary food source, bamboo, and a subsequent range constriction and significant panda population declines (Fan et al., 2014; Li et al., 2015; Songer, Delion, Biggs, & Huang, 2011; Tuanmu et al., 2013; Zang et al., 2017).”
• Panda Downlisted but not Out of the Woods (2018, background): “Panda numbers are currently increasing so here we must invoke the worrisome projections of climate change models predicting significant losses of panda habitat (Tuanmu et al. 2013), increasing fragmentation due to road and other infrastructure construction (SFA 2015), and increasing livestock encroa”