Blind/Referenceless Image Spatial Quality Evaluator
By Anish Mittal, Anush K. Moorthy, A. Bovik. Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, 2011
417 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Media Technology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3d148be382d53ce5a8e6e8a5101be814f93cf95c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Luc Van Gool
- Radu Timofte
- Lei Zhang
- Ming-Hsuan Yang
- Dacheng Tao
- Chen Change Loy
- Kai Zhang
- Wangmeng Zuo
In Media Technology
Citations in the corpus
- Learning without Human Scores for Blind Image Quality Assessment (2013, methodology): “The current blind image quality assessment (BIQA) methods can be classified into two categories: distortion specific methods [1,8,9,18,25] and distortion independent methods [4,10,13,14,16,17,21,27].”
- Objective quality assessment of multiply distorted images (2012, methodology): “This was taken as evidence that the scores from the two parts of the study could be combined for analysis without the need for realignment as in [9]”
- Hierarchical Conditional Flow: A Unified Framework for Image Super-Resolution and Image Rescaling (2021, methodology): “With perceptual loss and GAN loss (i.e., HCFlow++), the perceptual metrics are further improved by significant margins in terms of LPIPS and BRISQUE, which is confirmed by the visual results.”