Energetics of incubation
By J. Tinbergen, Jb Williams. 2002
155 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3cde963175aa109469d7299d28a6adc202055879
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
Citations in the corpus
- Latitudinal variation in avian incubation attentiveness and a test of the food limitation hypothesis (2007, background): “Energetic expenditures during incubation are considerable, and can influence future prospects of parents (Thomson et al. 1998; Visser & Lessells 2001; Tinbergen & Williams 2002).”
- The energetic costs of egg heating constrain incubation attendance but do not determine daily energy expenditure in the pectoral sandpiper (2004, background): “7 BMR for incubating starlings (Ricklefs and Williams, 1984), typical of many bird species (Tinbergen and Williams, 2002).”
- An Overview of the Factors Influencing the Morphology and Thermal Properties of Avian Nests (2013, background): “, 2004; McNab, 2009) and the intensity of a reproductive event (Zann et al., 1995; Tinbergen and Williams, 2002; Aslan and Yavuz, 2010).”
- High daily energy expenditure of incubating shorebirds on High Arctic tundra : a circumpolar study (2003, methodology): “A data set based on DLW measurements for terrestrial birds (including shorebirds) during the incubation phase at lower latitudes has recently been compiled by Tinbergen & Williams (2002). We have relied on their review for comparative purposes.”
- Travelling to breed (2006, background): “Parental energetics during incubation can be assessed by using doubly-labelled water (Speakman 1997; Tinbergen and Williams 2002) requiring capture and recapture of the incubating parent(s).”
- Seasonal and latitudinal trends in clutch size : Thermal constraints during laying and incubation (2005, background): “Studies using doubly labeled water have shown that parents spend as much energy incubating as when feeding nestlings (reviewed in Williams 1996), with the difference in field metabolic rate between incubation and nestling phases being least pronounced in small birds (Tinbergen and Williams 2002).”