Storks Deliver Babies (p= 0.008)

By R. Matthews. 2000

83 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Genetics, Statistics and Probability

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. Jan Peters
2. Joris M. Mooij
3. Dominik Janzing
4. Bernhard Schölkopf

In Genetics

1. Jan Peters
2. Joris M. Mooij
3. Dominik Janzing
4. Bernhard Schölkopf
5. Yoshua Bengio
6. Eleni Sgouritsa

In Statistics and Probability

1. Bernhard Schölkopf
2. Dominik Janzing
3. Jan Peters
4. Kun Zhang
5. Joris M. Mooij
6. Stefan Bauer
7. Anirudh Goyal
8. Yoshua Bengio

Citations in the corpus

• Toward Causal Representation Learning (2021, background): “For example, the frequency of storks is a reasonable predictor for human birth rates in Europe [168].”
• Towards Causal Representation Learning (2021, background): “For example, the frequency of storks is a reasonable predictor for human birth rates in Europe [168].”
• On causal and anticausal learning (2012, background): “An example illustrating the difference between the statistical and the causal point of view is the correlation between the frequency of storks and the human birth rate (Matthews, 2000).”
• Distinguishing Cause from Effect Using Observational Data: Methods and Benchmarks (2014, background): “Data has been collected for different countries and shows a significant correlation between X and Y (Matthews, 2000).”
• Distinguishing Cause from Effect Using Observational Data: Methods and Benchmarks (2014, background): “Data has been collected for different countries and shows a significant correlation between X and Y (Matthews, 2000).”