A comparative study of the dispersal of 10 species of stream invertebrates

By J. M. Elliott. 2003

130 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3ca8f7971cf932fc763f6f3ba02f13e6dacb6eff

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. J. Richardson
2. Frithjof Lutscher
3. J. Rosenfeld
4. R. Nisbet
5. S. Naman
6. Michel Loreau
7. Andrew Gonzalez

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. R. Nisbet
2. Frithjof Lutscher
3. J. Richardson
4. Elizaveta Pachepsky
5. J. Rosenfeld
6. S. Naman
7. Michel Loreau
8. Andrew Gonzalez

Citations in the corpus

• Population persistence in the face of advection (2010, background): “well documented in many species; it ranges from several meters to kilometers, depending on stream and species (e.g., Elliott 2003; Hershey et al. 1993; Macneale et al. 2005; Muller 1954, 1982; Turner and Williams 2000; Waters 1972; Williams and Hynes 1976).”
• Causes and consequences of invertebrate drift in running waters: from individuals to populations and trophic fluxes (2016, background): “In contrast, other studies have found drift to be either proportional or unrelated to benthic densities (Corkum 1978; Statzner et al. 1987; Humphries 2002; Shearer et al. 2003; Elliott 2003; Weber et al. 2014) and demonstrated no differences in individual condition between drifting and benthic indiv”