Agonism and shelter competition between invasive and indigenous crayfish species

By Francesca Gherardi, W. H. Daniels. 2004

104 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The role of behavior in the success of invasive crustaceans (2010, background): “The invasive crayfish P. clarkii was compared in the laboratory with the native P. acutus acutus by Gherardi and Daniels (2004).”
Contributions of larval biology to crustacean research: a review (2006, background): “In spite of such inherent constraints, studies of larval biology have greatly contributed to crustacean research as a whole, especially on life-history studies (ontogeny of species-specific traits) and in the reconstruction of phylogenetic relationships among higher taxa (“Evo-Devo” perspective).”
Boldness underlies foraging success of invasive Lepidodactylus lugubris geckos in the human landscape. (2008, background): “Invaders may be more aggressive than residents (Human & Gordon 1996; Holway et al. 2002; Gherardi & Cioni 2004; Gherardi & Daniels 2004), and behavioural interference can allow invaders to obtain more resources at the expense of residents (Case & Gilpin 1974; Langkilde & Shine 2004; Rowles & O’Dowd…”
Understanding the impact of invasive crayfish (2007, background): “…and Goshima 2003] also when NICS showed a low preference for the shelter in a noncompetitive context [P. clarkii vs. A. pallipes, Gherardi and Cioni 2004, and vs. P. acutus acutus, Gherardi and Daniels 2004; but not P. leniusculus vs. Austropotamobius torrentium (Schrank), Vorburger and Ribi 1999].”