Critical Psychology: What It Is and What It Is Not

By I. Parker. 2007

144 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Health Professions, General Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3c7ee57daae36491684dd04a44ccdcfefad17895

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

1. B. Wigginton
2. S. McClelland
3. Michelle N. Lafrance

In General Psychology

1. B. Wigginton
2. S. McClelland
3. Michelle N. Lafrance

In Social Psychology

1. B. Wigginton
2. S. McClelland
3. Michelle N. Lafrance

Citations in the corpus

• Learning critical feminist research: A brief introduction to feminist epistemologies and methodologies (2019, background): “Perhaps, then, a more useful instruction is that certain methods better fit particular epistemologies in terms of their assumptions and possibilities for answering research questions (Marecek, 2003; Parker, 2007).”
• Intimate Justice: A Critical Analysis of Sexual Satisfaction (2010, background): “This critical historiographic approach allows us as readers of research to evaluate how definitions of constructs move from theory, to method, to findings, and finally, to interpretation (Parker, 2007).”