Ecological networks: A spatial concept for multi-actor planning of sustainable landscapes

By P. Opdam, E. Steingröver, S. Rooij. 2006

571 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3c62e394579284862a87fa44a1c7df146c4665ba

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Targeting and evaluating biodiversity conservation action within fragmented landscapes: an approach based on generic focal species and least-cost networks (2010, methodology): “In a similar fashion, van Rooij et al. (2003) and Opdam et al. (2006) used ecoprofiles and ecological networks as a basis for integrating biodiversity conservation into the development of sustainable landscapes.”
Mapping hotspots of multiple landscape functions: a case study on farmland afforestation in Scotland (2007, methodology): “We propose that the type of analysis presented in this paper could be used to inform the choice between conservation-oriented approaches and other approaches which ‘‘do not pre-focus on more natural structures in the landscape’’ (Opdam et al. 2006).”
Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on Earth’s ecosystems (2015, background): “New fragmentation experiments should consider how multiple fragments in a landscape interact, creating an ecological network in which the collective benefit of ecosystem services may be greater than the sum of services provided by individual fragments ( 81 , 82 ).”
Multi-functional landscapes in semi arid environments: implications for biodiversity and ecosystem services (2010, background): “So too is the development of a shared vision and aim for the long term persistence of biodiversity (Opdam et al. 2006), and the actual design of these landscapes (Nassauer and Opdam 2008).”
A Graph‐Theory Framework for Evaluating Landscape Connectivity and Conservation Planning (2008, background): “Graph theory may be well suited for selecting habitat reserves (Opdam et al. 2006; Pascual-Hortal & Saura 2006; Minor & Urban 2007).”
Impacts of invasive Australian acacias: implications for management and restoration (2011, background): “…can be increased within organized stakeholder groups through effective communication about how ecosystem services are affected by Acacia species (Briggs, 2001; Aronson et al., 2010) and by providing alternative restoration options that result in similar landscape functions (Opdam et al., 2006).”