A Note on Rubin's Statistical Matching Using File Concatenation With Adjusted Weights and Multiple Imputations

By C. Moriarity, F. Scheuren. 2003

68 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Statistical Matching for Categorical Data: Displaying Uncertainty and Using Logical Constraints (2006, methodology): “It can be proved that the uncertainty distribution for rYZ is a uniform distribution between a minimum and maximum value (these extrema are well studied and discussed in: Kadane 1978, Moriarity and Scheuren 2003, Rässler 2002).”
Tuning multiple imputation by predictive mean matching and local residual draws (2014, background): “Moriarity and Scheuren suggested the use of ‘constrained’ matching [32], where each h can only donate xh once.”
Poverty Effects of Russia’s WTO Accession: Modeling “Real” Households and Endogenous Productivity Effects (2005, methodology): “We have employed both small area estimation (SAE) and Matching techniques (see Elbers et al., 2003; Rao, 1999; Moriarity and Scheuren, 2003) to generate sources of income data for all 55,000 plus households in the HBS.”