Do Residential Water Demand Side Management Policies Measure Up? An Analysis of Eight California Water Agencies

By M. Renwick, Richard D. Green. 2000

419 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Ocean Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3c3003e82bf165089d061135fb4d93fdad8ea449

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Ocean Engineering

Citations in the corpus

Negotiating everyday life: The role of energy and water consumption feedback (2011, background): “While research on water feedback is less common (Arbues et al., 2003; Arroyo et al., 2005; Renwick and Green, 2000), a small trial of IHDs displaying personalized water, gas and electricity consumption to households in Melbourne found that water feedback achieved an additional 5 per cent reduction a”
Household Adoption of Water-Efficient Equipment: The Role of Socio-Economic Factors, Environmental Attitudes and Policy (2010, methodology): “See Sorrell and Dimitropoulos (2008) for a recent review of different definitions of the rebound effect and a very useful discussion of their implications for empirical estimates.”
Price elasticity reconsidered: Panel estimation of an agricultural water demand function (2006, background): “Renwick and Green [2000] find that these type of programs have a significant effect on residential water demand.”
Comparing price and nonprice approaches to urban water conservation (2009, background): “Renwick and Green [2000] estimate no significant effect of ultra low-flush toilet rebates in Santa Barbara, California.”
ECONOMICS AND THE MODELING OF WATER RESOURCES AND POLICIES (2012, background): “Renzetti (2002b, Chapter 3) provides another wide-ranging summary of the literature, with a commentary on methodological issues. Worthington and Hoffman (2008) survey a sample of post-1980 water demand literature.”
An Estimation of Residential Water Demand Using Co-Integration and Error Correction Techniques (2007, background): “Most applied studies focus on areas of the USA (e.g. Nieswiadomy and Molina 1989; Renwick and Green 2000; Taylor et al. 2004).”
A review of residential water conservation tool performance and influences on implementation effectiveness (2006, methodology): “This repeats the findings among low-income households in the USA by Renwick and Green (2000).”
Climate change adaptation and water resource management: A review of the literature (2014, background): “Concern has been expressed in the media and, to some extent, the peer-reviewed literature about the possible impact in Pasadena, California resulted in aggregate water savings (Kiefer et al., 1993), as did a program of mandatory water use restrictions in Santa Barbara, California (Renwick and Green,”
An Empirical Survey of Residential Water Demand Modelling (2008, neutral): “Outside of the household-level surveys, most existing research has focused instead on aggregated mains, community or utility-level data [see, for example, Thomas and Syme (1988), Stevens et al. (1992), Nieswiadomy and Cobb (1993), Barkatullah (1996), Timmins (2002)].”
Evaluating Municipal Water Conservation Policies Using a Dynamic Simulation Model (2010, background): “However it is widely recognized that actual savings due to low flow appliances are usually lower than rated because of the behavioral response of consumers (Davis 2008; Mayer et al. 1999; Renwick and Green 2000 ).”
Estimation of Water Demand in Developing Countries (2010, background): “For example, Rizaiza (1991) estimates separately water-demand equations for households with a private connection and for households supplied with tankers in the four major cities (with populations between 700,000 and 4 million) of the western region of Saudi Arabia (namely Jeddah, Makkah, Madinah, a”