Advanced distance sampling

By S. T. Buckland, David R. Anderson, K. Burnham, Jeffrey L. Laake, David L. Borchers, L. Thomas. 2004

283 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3c208bd28e6f5975176d94426d22163e6fbc22de

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Comparative interpretation of count, presence–absence and point methods for species distribution models (2012, methodology): “Count methods, in particular, are well-established in ecology, primarily because of their potential for estimating and predicting population abundance (Guisan & Zimmermann 2000; Austin 2002; Buckland et al. 2004; Guisan&Thuiller 2005).”
INCORPORATING AVAILABILITY FOR DETECTION IN ESTIMATES OF BIRD ABUNDANCE (2007, background): “1; Okamura et al. 2003, Buckland et al. 2004).”
Modern Statistics for Spatial Point Processes * (2007, background): “More details on the data set and analysis of line transect data can be found in Skaug, Øien, Schweder & Bøthun (2004), Waagepetersen & Schweder (2006), and Buckland et al. (2004).”
The geometric mean of relative abundance indices : a biodiversity measure with a difference (2011, methodology): “Following standard distance sampling methods, we assume that all birds on the line (i.e., at distance 0) are detected and that the probability of detection then drops with increasing distance from the line (Buckland et al. 2001, 2004).”
Spatial models for distance sampling data: recent developments and future directions (2013, methodology): “This article is concerned with combining spatial modelling techniques with distance sampling (Buckland et al. 2001, 2004).”
Inferring trackline detection probabilities, g(0), for cetaceans from apparent densities in different survey conditions (2015, methodology): “A defined study area is surveyed with systematic or random transect lines, and cetacean density is calculated using either conventional distance sampling or multiple-covariate distance sampling methods (Buckland et al. 2001, 2004).”
Estimating abundance of killer whales in the nearshore waters of the Gulf of Alaska and Aleutian Islands using line-transect sampling (2007, methodology): “Both Conventional Distance Sampling (CDS) and Multiple Covariate Distance Sampling (MCDS) approaches were used (Buckland et al. 2001, 2004; Marques and Buckland 2003).”
POINT-TRANSECT SURVEYS FOR SONGBIRDS: ROBUST METHODOLOGIES (2006, background): “Survey design issues are addressed by Buckland et al. (2001, 2004).”