A minimum income standard for Britain : what people think
By J. Bradshaw, S. Middleton, Abigail Davis, Nina Oldfield, N. Smith, L. Cusworth, Julie Williams. 2008
169 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3c1fd36fc7a2b08818c3d5e09d78827bc9fa5f88
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Angela Druckman
- Tim Jackson
- Manuel Llorca
- Ana Rodríguez-Álvarez
- Tooraj Jamasb
- Richard Moore
- Mona Chitnis
- S. Sorrell
Citations in the corpus
- Definitions of fuel poverty: Implications for policy (2012, methodology): “Research funded by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation, and undertaken at Loughborough University and the University of York, has sought to establish the minimum incomes needed by different household types in different locations to participate in society (Bradshaw et al., 2008).”
- The bare necessities: How much household carbon do we really need? (2010, methodology): “The minimum standard of living budgets are for ‘average’ households in Britain, and it is acknowledged by the authors that actual budgets would, of course, vary.”
- Objective vs. subjective fuel poverty and self-assessed health (2020, methodology): “This approach uses measures such as the 10% rule (Boardman, 1991), the Minimum Income Standard (MIS) indicator (Bradshaw et al ., 2008), the Low Income High Costs (LIHC) or the After Fuel Cost Poverty (AFCP) methodologies (Hills, 2011); ii) subjective approach considering perceptions of whether…”