Resource degradation, marginalization, and poverty in small-scale fisheries: threats to social-ecological resilience in India and Brazil

By P. Nayak, L. E. Oliveira, Fikret Berkes. 2014

143 citations recorded by the source corpus.

In this study we examine poverty in local fisheries using a social-ecological resilience lens. In assessing why “fishery may rhyme with poverty”, Christophe Bene suggests a typology of impoverishment processes, which includes economic exclusion, social marginalization, class exploitation, and political disempowerment as key mechanisms that accelerate poverty. We extend his analysis by exploring these four mechanisms further and by intertwining them with processes of environmental change and degradation. Our goal is to understand poverty in local fisheries as a process rooted in social and institutional factors as influenced by ecological dynamics. We argue that understanding poverty will require a focus on the social-ecological system (SES) as a whole, and addressing poverty will mean rebuilding not only collapsed stocks but the entire social-ecological system, including restoring relationships between resources and people. Information from two cases, the Chilika Lagoon on the Bay of Bengal in India, and the Paraty region on the southeastern coast of Brazil, is used to understand how fishery social-ecological systems come under pressure from drivers at multiple levels, resulting in a range of impacts and pushing the system to a breaking point or collapse. We analyze elements of what it takes for the whole system to break down or collapse and push fishers into poverty and marginalization. The Chilika SES has already broken down, and the Paraty SES is under pressure from multiple drivers of change. The two cases help contrast key dynamics in the social, cultural, economic, political, and environmental spheres, for lessons on system collapse and recovery. Rebuilding fisheries may be examined as a process of building and strengthening resilience. The challenge is to make the fishery social-ecological system more resilient, with more flexibility and options, not only within fishing activities but also within a range of other sectors.

Subfields: Business and International Management, Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3c19a1874dd927c0440b16a6f56c0c9c9b7731fa

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Business and International Management

  1. Edward B. Barbier

In Economics and Econometrics

  1. Edward B. Barbier
  2. Elena M. Finkbeiner
  3. Robert M. Ewers
  4. Stephen Polasky
  5. Aaron M. Ellison
  6. K. Turner
  7. Kathleen Segerson
  8. G. Atkinson

In Sociology and Political Science

  1. Edward B. Barbier
  2. Elena M. Finkbeiner

Citations in the corpus