Elastic effects on surface physics

By P. Müller, A. Saúl. 2004

456 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Condensed Matter Physics, Mechanics of Materials

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3c17fe1ea24611ff0bccb32c936eff568b31a765

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

In Condensed Matter Physics

In Mechanics of Materials

Citations in the corpus

A unified scheme for prediction of effective moduli of multiphase composites with interface effects. Part I: Theoretical framework (2007, methodology): “Recent expositions of the physical background of the interface stress model can be found in the works of Müller and Saúl (2004), Duan et al. (2005a,b), Dingreville et al. (2005), and Huang and Wang (in press).”
Size-dependent elastic behavior of FGM ultra-thin films based on generalized refined theory (2009, unknown): “In fact, the surface of a solid is such a region that its own atom arrangement differs from that of the bulk, and hence its macromechanical properties (Ibach, 1997; Muller and Saul, 2004).”
A theory of hyperelasticity of multi-phase media with surface/interface energy effect (2006, background): “The physical origin of surface/interface energy and surface/interface stresses in solids has been discussed by many researchers (e.g., cf. [1]–[ 6 ], among others).”
Eshelby formalism for nano-inhomogeneities (2005, background): “One definition is the interface excess of bulk stress (Ibach 1997; Müller & Saúl 2004).”
Crystal surfaces in and out of equilibrium: A modern view (2010, background): “Phys., Vol. 82, No. 1, January–March 2010 underlying crystal and therefore interact elastically Marchenko and Parshin, 1980; Jayaprakash et al., 1984; Houchmandzadeh and Misbah, 1995; Müller and Saul, 2004 .”
Statics and Dynamics of Soft Wetting (2020, methodology): “…pressure-sensitive adhesives exhibit a large nonlinear viscoelastic dissipation during debonding due to the formation of fibrils from cavitation (Teisseire et al. 2007, Villey et al. 2015) (Figure 1g), as observed using probe tack tests (Nase et al. 2008, Vilmin et al. 2010, Chopin et al. 2018).”
Second strain gradient elasticity of nano-objects (2016, methodology): “The need for a third displacement gradient or, equivalently, a second strain gradient theory, and the significance of the cohesion parameter b0 were recently re-examined for elastic fluids by Forest et al. (2011) and for isotropic solids by Cordero (2011) and Ojaghnezhad and Shodja (2013).”