A note on the use of the analytic hierarchy process for environmental impact assessment.

By Ramakrishnan Ramanathan. Journal of Environmental Management, 2001

623 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3c0e58e771f6425d8782411912416b80c52b8606

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

1. Ali Emrouznejad
2. Thomas P. Seager
3. Igor Linkov
4. Marianna Marra
5. G. Kiker
6. Todd Bridges
7. Arun Varghese

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. Francisco Javier Santos-Arteaga
2. Ali Emrouznejad
3. Thomas P. Seager
4. Igor Linkov
5. Madjid Tavana
6. Marianna Marra
7. Mehdi Soltanifar
8. G. Kiker

Citations in the corpus

• The state of the art development of AHP (1979–2017): a literature review with a social network analysis (2017, background): “(Ramanathan, 2001) and proposed a version of AHP, the multiplicative version, to support group decisions in climate change negotiations (Ramanathan, 1998).”
• Analytical hierarchy process: revolution and evolution (2021, background): “Among its main strengths we must highlight the following ones: a. AHP displays higher flexibility than other methods and a substantial capacity to identify inconsistencies(Ramanathan,2001).”
• Application of Multicriteria Decision Analysis in Environmental Decision Making (2005, methodology): “Ramanathan (2001) recommended the use of AHP for considering multiple criteria and multiple stakeholders in EIA as well as to assess the socioeconomic impact of a proposed liquefied petroleum gas recovery plant in an industrial area in India. odology to rank environmental impact assessments related…”