Dyadic attachments and community connectedness: Links with youths' loneliness experiences

By H. Chipuer. 2001

142 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3c0a768012d2858a7d97aa345cdb9131ce98edea

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In General Health Professions

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

The clinical significance of loneliness: a literature review. (2006, background): “Furthermore, loneliness in childhood and adolescence has also been linked to concurrent attachment difficulties (Chipuer, 2001).”
Parental perception of social risk and of positive potentiality of outdoor autonomy for children: The development of two instruments (2005, unknown): “…neighbourhood relations (Farrall, Bannister, Ditton, & Gilchrist, 2000; Ross & Jang, 2000; Santinello, Gonzi, & Scacchi, 1998), by a stronger sense of community (Chipuer, 2001; Santinello et al., 1998) or neighbourhood attachment (Brown, Perkins, & Brown, 2003; Riger, LeBailly, & Gordon, 1981).”
On children's independent mobility: the interplay of demographic, environmental, and psychosocial factors (2012, background): “Conversely, less fear of crime is associated with a stronger sense of community (Santinello et al. 1998, Chipuer 2001) and neighborhood attachment (Riger et al. 1981, Brown et al. 2003).”
Sense of place amongst adolescents and adults in two rural Australian towns: The discriminating features of place attachment, sense of community and place dependence in relation to place identity (2003, background): “Except for recent research by Chipuer (2001), no study has compared the community sentiments of adolescents and adults within the same setting, so we have little indication how patterns of association compare between age groups.”
Loneliness and physical activity: A systematic review (2016, methodology): “…n = 113 boys without coordination dysfunction); age: M= 11.58 (SD = 0.80) respectively M= 11.75 (SD = 0.78) Cross-sectional Modified version (Chipuer, 2001) of the Loneliness & Social Dissatisfaction Questionnaire (revised version; Asher & Wheeler, 1985) Observation and ratings by parents…”
Belongingness as a Protective Factor Against Loneliness and Potential Depression in a Multicultural Middle School (2010, background): “28, respectively, from Chipuer, 2001, and Goossens & Beyers, 2002). For depression, following Beck et al. (2001) and their norming population as described above, with one evenly weighted question removed, our sample, M = 13.”