Life-long learning based on dynamic combination model
By Boya Ren, Hongzhi Wang, Jianzhong Li, Hong Gao. 2017
47 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Meta & Continual Learning
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Tyler L. Hayes
- Christopher Kanan
- German Ignacio Parisi
- Vincenzo Lomonaco
- Alexander Rainer Tassilo Gepperth
- Fei Ye
- Adrian G. Bors
- Benedikt Pfülb
In Meta & Continual Learning
- Tyler L. Hayes
- Christopher Kanan
- German Ignacio Parisi
- Alexander Rainer Tassilo Gepperth
- Benedikt Pfülb
- Stefan Wermter
- Ronald Kemker
- Nathan D. Cahill
Citations in the corpus
- Continual Lifelong Learning with Neural Networks: A Review (2018, background): “Robins (1995) showed that interleaving information of new experiences with internally generated patterns of previous experiences help consolidate existing knowledge without explicitly storing training samples.”
- Measuring Catastrophic Forgetting in Neural Networks (2017, methodology): “Two methods that try to alleviate the memory usage problem are Accuracy Weighted Ensem-bles and Life-long Machine Learning (Wang et al. 2003; Ren et al. 2017).”
- Memory Efficient Experience Replay for Streaming Learning (2018, methodology): “Ensembling methods train multiple models and combine their outputs to make predictions [18], [22], [63], [66], [71].”
- Task-Free Continual Learning via Online Discrepancy Distance Learning (2022, neutral): “One of the most popular approaches to relieve forgetting is by imposing a regularization loss within the optimization procedure [7, 11, 13, 16, 19, 25, 26, 31, 34, 35, 40, 41, 57], where the network’s parameters which are important to the past tasks are penalized when updating.”
- Learning latent representations across multiple data domains using Lifelong VAEGAN (2020, methodology): “by employing memory replay. Regularization approaches in order to alleviate catastrophic forgetting add an auxiliary term that penalizes changes in the weights when the model is trained on a new task [14,26,29,33,38,48,54,60]. Dynamic architectures would increase the number of neurons and network la”
- A comprehensive, application-oriented study of catastrophic forgetting in DNNs (2019, methodology): “Principal recent approaches to avoid CF include ensemble methods (Ren et al., 2017; Fernando et al., 2017), dual-memory systems (Shin et al., 2017; Kemker & Kanan, 2017; Rebuffi et al., 2017; Gepperth & Karaoguz, 2016) and regularization approaches.”
- RODEO: Replay for Online Object Detection (2020, neutral): “work sparsely updates weights to mitigate interference [8], 3) ensembling multiple classifiers together [9, 11, 43, 47, 53], and 4) rehearsal/replay models that store a subset of previous training inputs (or generate previous inputs) to mix with new examples when updating the network [4, 16, 17, 21,”
- Continual Variational Autoencoder Learning via Online Cooperative Memorization (2022, methodology): “One of the most popular approaches is to use a regularization loss within the optimization procedure [14,21,23,26,36,41,47,52,56], where the network parameters which are important to the past learnt data are re-weighted when learning a new task, in order to attempt to preserve past knowledge.”
- Lifelong Teacher-Student Network Learning (2021, methodology): “While deep learning approaches perform well in many specific data classification applications [4], they suffer from the catastrophic forgetting problem [5], [6], [7], [8] when”
- Lifelong Infinite Mixture Model Based on Knowledge-Driven Dirichlet Process (2021, methodology): “Regularization methods introduce an auxiliary term in the loss function in order to penalize changes in the network’s weights when learning a new task [12, 15, 17, 23, 28, 38].”