Can Investors Detect Managers' Lack of Spontaneity? Adherence to Predetermined Scripts during Earnings Conference Calls
By Joshua A. Lee. 2016
196 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Finance
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3bf3d38ac4b163f5cc645a9ceceaea070dac81d3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
In Finance
Citations in the corpus
- Analyst Information Discovery and Interpretation Roles: A Topic Modeling Approach (2018, unknown): “For example, Li et al. (2015) show that 61% of analyst recommendation revisions are issued within three days of corporate events; Livnat and Zhang (2012) find that 74% of analyst forecast revisions promptly follow corporate events; Altınkılıç and Hansen (2009) claim that almost 80% of recommendation”
- Measuring Corporate Culture Using Machine Learning (2020, background): “Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3256608 6 interactive nature, which allows for more extemporaneous disclosures targeting specific concerns raised by call participants (Frankel, Johnson, and Skinner 1999; Matsumoto, Pronk, and Roelofsen 2011; Lee 2016).”
- Hyperbole or Reality? Investor Response to Extreme Language in Earnings Conference Calls (2019, background): “FLS Proportion of sentences in the earnings call containing a forward-looking term, from Muslu, Radhakrishnan, Subramanyam, and Lim (2015). Earnings calls are from: https://seekingalpha.com/ Risk Proportion of sentences in the earnings call containing at least one of the riskrelated terms, from Krav”