Statistical Methods in Assessing Agreement

481 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Calibrating Environmental DNA Metabarcoding to Conventional Surveys for Measuring Fish Species Richness (2020, methodology): “We used Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) (Lawrence and Lin, 1989) and Bland-Altman analyses to evaluate how well species richness measured by eDNA metabarcoding agreed with conventional surveys (Bland and Altman, 1986).”
Quantitative comparison of immunohistochemical staining measured by digital image analysis versus pathologist visual scoring (2012, methodology): “In order to compare pathologist hand and Genie automated annotations, which represent the same clinical measure on the same scale, Bland-Altman plots were used [27].”
Assessment of the adequacy of mathematical models (2006, methodology): “…Exp Z Z CI Exp Z Z Exp Z Z ρ ρ ρ ρ σ σ σ σ × − × − × + × − ≤ ≤ × − × + × + × + [33] This CCC statistic has been used in evaluation of measuring devices such as “gold-standard” assays, chemical method comparisons, and instrument or assay validation (Dhanoa et al., 1999; Lin, 1992; Lin et al., 2002).”