The Matthew Matilda Effect in Science

By M. Rossiter. 1993

Subfields: Social Sciences & Humanities

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Sciences & Humanities

1. Stan Oklobdzija
2. Silvia Knobloch-Westerwick
3. Emily Bello-Pardo
4. Molly M. King
5. Jeffrey W. Lockhart
6. Shelley J. Correll
7. C. Knight
8. Martijn Schoonvelde

Citations in the corpus

• Diagnosing Gender Bias in Image Recognition Systems (2020, background): “A uthor M anuscript A uthor M anuscript A uthor M anuscript A uthor M anuscript (Rossiter 1993).”
• The Matilda Effect in Science Communication (2013, background): “About 20 years ago, Rossiter (1993) introduced the term Matilda effect for a systematic underrecognition of female scientists.”
• Men Set Their Own Cites High: Gender and Self-citation across Fields and over Time (2016, background): “As Rossiter (1993) documented, women’s academic contributions to science have been undervalued historically.”