Nutrition integrates environmental responses of ungulates.
By K. Parker, P. Barboza, M. Gillingham. 2009
654 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3bbb2f93cc53b04299728247bf0061fb6871e408
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
- R. Terry Bowyer
- J. Kie
- Ryan A. Long
- M. Boyce
- T. Stephenson
- Mark Hebblewhite
- C. Anderson
- Mark A. Hurley
In Genetics
- J. Kie
- T. Stephenson
- Ryan A. Long
- R. Terry Bowyer
- C. Anderson
- Mark Hebblewhite
- Mark A. Hurley
- P. Lendrum
Citations in the corpus
- Soil ingestion, nutrition and the seasonality of anthrax in herbivores of Etosha National Park (2013, background): “When resource quality or availability is insufficient, animals draw on body reserves, experiencing a decline in body fat and body protein (Parker et al. 2009).”
- Habitat selection by mule deer during migration: effects of landscape structure and natural-gas development (2012, background): “The ability of herbivores to track phenological progression of newly emergent vegetation across the landscape is of particular importance to pregnant females attempting to supporting the increased demands of late gestation (Parker et al. 2009).”
- Demographic Response of Mule Deer to Experimental Reduction of Coyotes and Mountain Lions in Southeastern Idaho (2011, background): “1973), and nutritional resources available to the fawn (Parker et al. 2009).”
- Timing of seasonal migration in mule deer: effects of climate, plant phenology, and life‐history characteristics (2011, background): “Despite the wellrecognized carry over of nutritional condition from the energetic costs and benefits from previous seasons (Parker et al. 2009), few studies have considered whether differences in nutritional condition among individuals affect the timing of migration by large herbivores (Bolger et…”
- Revisions of Rump Fat and Body Scoring Indices for Deer, Elk, and Moose (2010, background): “Nutritional condition is the integrator of nutritional intake and expenditure, can substantially affect survival and reproduction and, thus, is a key measure of habitat quality (Parker et al. 2009).”
- Observed and predicted effects of climate change on Arctic caribou and reindeer (2018, background): “During the summer, lactation by females places additional energetic demands on 107 cows (Parker et al. 1990; Barboza and Parker 2008; Parker et al. 2009) that must be met 108 through adequate nutrition (Gerhart et al. 1996).”
- Behavior and nutritional condition buffer a large‐bodied endotherm against direct and indirect effects of climate (2014, background): “Similarly, Parker et al. (2009) and Wilson et al. (2012) argued that, during much of the year, behavioral control over energy balance is more likely to be manifested through minimization of energy expenditures for thermoregulation and activity than through maximization of energy intake.”
- A review of the population dynamics of mule deer and black‐tailed deer Odocoileus hemionus in North America (2013, background): “Nutrition further influences mule deer dynamics since fecundity and fawn birth weight are driven by nutritional status (Parker et al. 2009).”
- Green‐wave surfing increases fat gain in a migratory ungulate (2018, background): “This finding is especially important given that fat gain can influence key vital rates in temperate ungulate populations, from reproduction to juvenile and adult survival (Parker et al. 2009).”
- Life-History Characteristics of Mule Deer: Effects of Nutrition in a Variable Environment (2014, background): “Nutritional condition integrates the balance of nutritional intake and expenditure, and is represented primarily by the deposition and catabolism of body fat (Parker et al. 2009).”