Rethinking governance and value in commodity chains through global recycling networks

By M. Crang, A. Hughes, N. Gregson, L. Norris. 2013

181 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The dominant political-economic approaches to global trade flows known as global value chains and global production networks offer powerful insights into the coordination and location of globally stretched supply chains, in particular from global South to North. By way of both conceptual and empirical challenge, this paper highlights flows of end-of-life goods from the global North towards the global South. This involves the disassembly and destruction of goods to recover secondary resources for further rounds of commodity production. Global recycling networks take things of rubbish value (often spent or ‘end-of-life’ goods) and turn them back into resources in other places and production networks. They operate not through adding value, but by connecting different regimes of value. The paper does not set out a new conceptual framework, but asks what challenges the rekindling of value in used goods creates for global commodity chain analysis and what insights those approaches bring to looking at ‘waste’ flows. The examples of used clothing and end-of-life merchant ships are mobilised to illustrate the dynamics of global recycling networks and to challenge prevailing commodity chain approaches in three key areas – supply logics and crosscutting networks, value and materiality, and inter-firm governance. We argue that resource recovery engenders highly complex and brokered forms of governance that relate to practices of valuing heterogeneous materials and which contrast markedly with the modes of co-ordination dominated by ‘big capital typical of global production networks for consumer goods.

Subfields: Business and International Management, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3bb5b727da2c21edc5e5a8c798109ddeb6892bfc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Business and International Management

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

The circular economy: New or Refurbished as CE 3.0? — Exploring Controversies in the Conceptualization of the Circular Economy through a Focus on History and Resource Value Retention Options (2017, background): “This brings us to the issue of leakages from CE: despite a 40-years history of recycling preferences in Europe (Williams 2015), we still face illicit and illegal exports of waste towards developing countries with weak regulations and enforcement capacities (Crang et al., 2013; Gregson et al., 2015; ”
Sustainability governance of chains and networks: a review and future outlook (2015, background): “…highlighted how vertical relations between producers, distributors and consumers are also a product of complex flows between ‘horizontally’ networked actors beyond the chain (building largely on earlier work by Crang (1996); Fine et al. (1996); Hughes and Reimer (2004b); Leslie and Reimer (1999).”