Misfit Criteria for Quantitative Comparison of Seismograms

217 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The ShakeOut earthquake scenario: Verification of three simulation sets (2010, methodology): “A quantitative comparison of some of the results of these simulations was presented by Kristekova et al. (2006).”
Full Seismic Waveform Modelling and Inversion (2011, background): “(2.35) More elaborate measures of misfit can be defined using, for instance, wavelet transforms (Kristekova et al., 2006, 2009), but E(t) as defined in (2.35) is sufficient for our purposes.”
Multiscale full waveform inversion (2013, methodology): “To quantify the misfit between observed and synthetic spectralelement seismograms, we use the time-frequency phase misfits introduced by Fichtner et al. (2008) on the basis of suggestions for the comparison of seismograms by Kristekova et al. (2006).”
The finite-difference and finite-element modeling of seismic wave propagation and earthquake motion (2007, methodology): “We will use the envelope and misfit criteria developed by Kristekova et al. (2006).”
Global adjoint tomography: first-generation model (2016, background): “…1988; Nolet 1987), generalized seismological data functionals (GSDF) (Gee & Jordan 1992), or more recently proposed time-frequency analysis (e.g. Kristekova et al. 2006; Fichtner et al. 2008) and instantaneous phase & envelope misfits (e.g. Bozdağ et al. 2011; Rickers et al. 2012); the latter…”