Priorities among effective clinical preventive services: results of a systematic review and analysis.
By Michael V. Maciosek, A. Coffield, N. Edwards, T. Flottemesch, M. Goodman, L. Solberg. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2006
676 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3b682e92cd6ae8f78f7784a1d7d3145d58415117
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In General Health Professions
Citations in the corpus
- Toward Reduced Poverty Across Generations: Early Findings from New York City’s Conditional Cash Transfer Program (2010, background): “) In a systematic review and analysis of recent interventions, Maciosek et al. (2006) find insufficient evidence to support the effectiveness of a variety of counseling and preventive (continued)”
- Evidence-based public health: a fundamental concept for public health practice. (2009, background): “How should they choose priority opportunities for programs and policies among all those recommended based on evidence reviews? As in clinical medicine (102), there are more recommendations than are practical for any department to introduce.”