Comparison of methods to detect rare and cryptic species: A case study using the red fox (Vulpes vulpes)

By S. J. Vine, Crowther, S. Lapidge, Chris R. Dickman, N. Mooney, M. Piggott, A. English. 2009

130 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Spatial and Temporal Structure of a Mesocarnivore Guild in Midwestern North America (2015, methodology): “We used remote cameras because the method has been successful to detect many carnivores in various habitats and climates (Silveira et al. 2003, Maffei et al. 2004, O'Connell et al. 2006, Linkie et al. 2008, Vine et al. 2009, Nielsen and McCullough 2009, Reed 2011).”
The history of wildlife camera trapping as a survey tool in Australia (2015, background): “Researchers have recognised the opportunity for these off-the-shelf tools to be used to study Australian wildlife (Cowled et al. 2006; Nelson and Scroggie 2009; Vine et al. 2009; Claridge et al. 2010; Meek 2010; Robley et al. 2010; Paull et al. 2011; Weston et al. 2011) and during the period from 20”
Individual hunting behaviour and prey specialisation in the house cat Felis catus: Implications for conservation and management (2015, background): “Although spotlight counts can be biased if carried out between different habitats and under different environmental conditions (Newsome et al., 2014; Vine et al., 2009), we assume that detectability of rabbits was relatively constant here owing to the open nature of the habitat in each study locatio”