A Gaussian process framework for modelling stellar activity signals in radial velocity data

By Vinesh Rajpaul, Suzanne Aigrain, Michael A. Osborne, Steven Reece, Stephen J. Roberts. 2015

219 citations recorded by the source corpus.

To date, the radial velocity (RV) method has been one of the most productive techniques for detecting and confirming extrasolar planetary candidates. Unfortunately, stellar activity can induce RV variations which can drown out or even mimic planetary signals - and it is notoriously difficult to model and thus mitigate the effects of these activity-induced nuisance signals. This is expected to be a major obstacle to using next-generation spectrographs to detect lower mass planets, planets with longer periods, and planets around more active stars. Enter Gaussian processes (GPs) which, we note, have a number of attractive features that make them very well suited to disentangling stellar activity signals from planetary signals. We present here a GP framework we developed to model RV time series jointly with ancillary activity indicators (e.g. bisector velocity spans, line widths, chromospheric activity indices), allowing the activity component of RV time series to be constrained and disentangled from e.g. planetary components. We discuss the mathematical details of our GP framework, and present results illustrating its encouraging performance on both synthetic and real RV datasets, including the publicly-available Alpha Centauri B dataset.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Astronomy and Astrophysics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3b5bd1477df786bce21b6fbf2d8ccaef0319115c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Timothy Morton
  2. Daniel Foreman-Mackey
  3. Vinesh Rajpaul
  4. Suzanne Aigrain
  5. R. Angus
  6. P. McMillan
  7. E. Thrane
  8. Colm Talbot

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. Daniel Foreman-Mackey
  2. Timothy Morton
  3. R. Angus
  4. Suzanne Aigrain
  5. Vinesh Rajpaul
  6. J. Johnson
  7. D. Charbonneau
  8. David W. Hogg

Citations in the corpus