Firm relocation decisions in The Netherlands: An ordered logit approach

By Jouke van Dijk, P. Pellenbarg. 2000

253 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Job Losses, Outsourcing and Relocation: Empirical Evidence Using Microdata (2006, unknown): “The paper adds to a growing literature on theoretical and empirical analysis of the microeconomic determinants of relocation and outsourcing: Pennings and Sleuwaegen (2000), Van Dijk and Pellenbarg (2000), Kimura (2002), Brouwer et al. (2004), Girma and Görg (2004), Holl (2004), Mol, (2005), Tomiura”
Why Butterflies Don’t Leave: Locational Behavior of Entrepreneurial Firms (2007, background): “A firm’s decision to relocate is determined, to a large extent, by internal factors (Van Dijk and Pellenbarg 2000; Brouwer, Mariotti, and Van Ommeren 2004), which means that looking at the life course of a firm should help explain what motivates the firm’s locational behavior.”
Empirical Studies in Industrial Location: An Assessment of Their Methods and Results (2009, unknown): “…of Belgian firms 16 Relocation studies that do not use specifications analogous to those described in Section 2 include Cooke (1983) and Brouwer et al. (2004), who use probit and logit specifications, respectively, and van Dijk and Pellenbarg (2000), who use ordered logit and probit specifications.”
Explaining Firm Employment Growth: Does Location Matter? (2004, background): “Therefore, firms will stay in sub-optimal locations till they approach the spatial margins of profitability ( Van Dijk and Pellenbarg, 2000b ).”