Does Operating Performance Increase Post-takeover for UK Takeovers? A Comparison of Performance Measures and Benchmarks

237 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Do Auctions Induce a Winner's Curse? New Evidence from the Corporate Takeover Market (2008, methodology): “In structuring our analysis of operating performance, we follow the general recommendations of Barber and Lyon (1996) as well as the approach in papers more specific to takeovers including Ghosh (2001), Heron and Lie (2002), and Powell and Stark (2005) .”
A century of corporate takeovers: What have we learned and where do we stand? (2008, methodology): “…Sample period Sample size Event window Type of M&As Operating Performance Measure Performance measure adjusted for effect of Results ( , =, ) Powell and Stark (2005), UK 1985-93 na (0, +3Y) All MA CF/TMV CF/BV CF/Sales Industry, Size and M/B a c Carline, Linn and Yadav (2002), UK 1985-94 81…”
The Long-Term Operating Performance of European Mergers and Acquisitions (2006, background): “However, most of empirical evidence reports no significant relation between the relative target size and post-merger performance (Powell and Stark, 2005; Moeller and Schlingemann, 2003; Heron and Lie, 2002; Sharma and Ho, 2002; Kruse et al., 2002; Healy et al., 1992).”
Restraining Overconfident CEOs through Improved Governance: Evidence from the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (2015, unknown): “Further, we look at post-takeover performance, as proxied by industry-adjusted Tobin’s Q and EBIT/Assets.”