Analysis of microsatellite DNA resolves genetic structure and diversity of chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) in California's Central Valley

By M. Banks, V. Rashbrook, M. Calavetta, C. Dean, D. Hedgecock. 2000

150 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Genetics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3b389b9457278ce04788d108e7076113b98d6b89

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Genetics

1. R. Gresswell
2. J. Rodzen
3. O. Berry
4. K. Miller
5. P. Hedrick
6. J. Ovenden
7. C. Primmer
8. B. May

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. R. Gresswell
2. J. Rodzen
3. K. Miller
4. P. Hedrick
5. C. Primmer
6. B. May
7. L. Laikre
8. S. Hinch

Citations in the corpus

• Microsatellite Analysis of Genetic Variation in Sturgeon: New Primer Sequences for Scaphirhynchus and Acipenser (2000, background): “Recent studies on chinook salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha (Banks et al. 2000), pink salmon O. gorbuscha (Olsen et al. 2000), and Atlantic herring Clupea harengus (Shaw et al. 1999) have incorporated microsatellite loci in examining genetic variability within and among species.”
• Estimation of Stock Composition and Individual Identification of Chinook Salmon across the Pacific Rim by Use of Microsatellite Variation (2006, background): “The application of DNA-level markers, particularly microsatellites, has provided much greater resolution among Chinook salmon populations than was possible with allozymes (Beacham et al. 1996, 2003b; Banks et al. 2000).”
• Pacific Rim Population Structure of Chinook Salmon as Determined from Microsatellite Analysis (2006, methodology): “Initial surveys employed variation at mitochondrial DNA (Wilson et al. 1987; Cronin et al. 1993) and minisatellites (Beacham et al. 1996), but these techniques were soon replaced by surveys of microsatellite variation (Banks et al. 2000; Nelson et al. 2001; Beacham et al. 2003).”
• Effective population size and temporal genetic change in stream resident brown trout (Salmo trutta, L.) (2003, background): “…recent studies have included temporal genetic data (e.g., Moran et al. 1995; Hansen and Loeschke 1996; Moffet and Crozier 1996; Stone et al. 1997; Estoup et al. 1998; Nielsen et al. 1999; Tessier and Bernatchez 1999; Banks et al. 2000; Carlsson and Nilsson 2000, 2001; Kanda and Allendorf 2001).”
• Resistance to three pathogens in the endangered winter-run chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha): effects of inbreeding and major histocompatibility complex genotypes (2002, methodology): “DNA from a portion of each fin clip (1 mm2) was extracted as described in Banks et al. (2000) and stored frozen at –20°C after extraction.”
• Ocean's eleven: a critical evaluation of the role of population, evolutionary and molecular genetics in the management of wild fisheries (2015, background): “Genetic structure is often evident not only spatially, but temporally, with different ‘runs’ within a single drainage being reproductively isolated from each other (Banks et al. 2000; Fillatre et al. 2003).”
• Genetic assessment of spatiotemporal evolutionary relationships and stocking effects in grayling (Thymallus thymallus, Salmonidae) (2002, background): “Genetic detection of the origins of salmonids and consequent selection of individuals utilized for founding hatchery broodstocks has also been applied in the supplementation programmes of the winter run chinook salmon (O. tshawytscha) spawning in the rivers of California’s Central Valley ( Banks et ”
• INFLUENCE OF BARRIERS TO MOVEMENT ON WITHIN‐WATERSHED GENETIC VARIATION OF COASTAL CUTTHROAT TROUT (2005, background): “Within age-0 samples, deviations from Hardy-Weinberg expectations or mul tiple failures of tests for genotypic linkage equilibrium (�10% failures per population [Banks et al. 2000]) were viewed as evidence of family sampling.”
• Identifying the contribution of wild and hatchery Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) to the ocean fishery using otolith microstructure as natural tags (2007, background): “Currently, no traditional tagging methods (e.g., physical or genetic) are sufficient to independently quantify the status of wild salmon from the Central Valley of California ( Banks et al. 2000; California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) 2001).”