Analysis of ambient noise energy distribution and phase velocity bias in ambient noise tomography, with application to SE Tibet

245 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Tutorial on seismic interferometry: Part 2 — Underlying theory and new advances (2010, background): “The accuracy depends on the regularity of the distribution of the sources along D van Manen et al., 2005; Fan and Snieder, 2009; Yao and van der Hilst, 2009 .”
Seismic imaging: From classical to adjoint tomography (2012, background): “…and Anderson, 1985; Trampert and Woodhouse, 1996; Yang and Forsyth, 2006), group velocity (e.g., Bensen et al., 2007; Ekström and Dziewonski, 1998; Yao et al., 2006) or arrival angle information (Larson et al., 1998; Laske and Masters, 1996) for multiple frequency ranges, then construct the 3D…”
Transdimensional tomography with unknown data noise (2012, background): “While recent studies propose to quantitatively measure the bias due to different effects (Larose et al. 2008; Weaver et al. 2009, 2011; Yao & Van der Hilst 2009), this is ongoing work and there is presently no consensus on the way to quantify errors.”