Using Biogeography to Help Set Priorities in Marine Conservation
By Sara A. Lourie, A. C. J. Vincent. 2004
175 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Genetics, Oceanography
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3b2ec32d31bfc4738321b6bc60649306e5da26ba
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
- T. Wernberg
- Robert J. Whittaker
- Brian W. Bowen
- S. Connell
- Luiz A. Rocha
- Nicholas A. J. Graham
- Miguel B. Araújo
- K. Willis
In Genetics
- Brian W. Bowen
- Luiz A. Rocha
- N. J. Fox
- M. Craig
- Robert J. Whittaker
- Corey J. A. Bradshaw
- P. Ng
- S. Connell
In Oceanography
- T. Wernberg
- S. Connell
- Craig R. Johnson
- Brian W. Bowen
- R. R. Warner
- Nicholas A. J. Graham
- Luiz A. Rocha
- S. Bennett
Citations in the corpus
- Priority areas for conservation of Western Australian coastal fishes: A comparison of hotspot, biogeographical and complementarity approaches (2005, background): “Theoretically, marine reserves located according to biogeographic zones should ensure representativeness, as the suites of species within each zone are different (Day and Roff, 2000; Roberts et al., 2003; Lourie and Vincent, 2004 ).”
- Using biogeographical patterns of endemic land snails to improve conservation planning for limestone karsts (2008, background): “Biogeographical information has proved useful in setting conservation priorities (Daily et al., 2003; Lourie and Vincent, 2004), but knowledge of karst species endemism and distribution patterns remains inadequate for such purposes.”
- The 'Great Southern Reef': social, ecological and economic value of Australia's neglected kelp forests (2016, methodology): “…that recognise both regional differences (Connell 2007), connectivity and ecosystem values (Magris et al. 2014), and assist the marine planning process based on the principles of Comprehensiveness, Adequacy and Representativeness (Day et al. 2003; Lourie and Vincent 2004) for Australian waters.”
- A global biogeographic classification of the mesopelagic zone (2017, background): “The value of global biogeographies as a key first step in meeting targets for representative protection of the world’s oceans is recognized (Lourie and Vincent, 2004), but such initiatives have primarily focused on benthic habitats or the epipelagic zone, necessitated by the limited availability of…”
- Phylogeography and the conservation of coral reef fishes (2007, background): “To date, the identiWcation of such hotspots has relied primarily on geography, and is largely based on taxonomy and species distributions (Roberts et al. 2002; Lourie and Vincent 2004b).”
- Capturing the cornerstones of coral reef resilience: linking theory to practice (2008, background): “Recent advances in collecting biogeographic information in the marine context (Lourie and Vincent 2004) provide readily applicable methods to capture spatial heterogeneity of coral reef systems.”
- Conservation Biogeography: assessment and prospect (2005, background): “…conservation science, we argue that it is here that the ‘Cinderella’ tag applies to conservation biogeography, and here where there is greatest need for critical attention to our science, and for greater interaction between those involved in theory and application (cf. Lourie & Vincent, 2004).”
- Geographical patterns of genetic structure in marine species with contrasting life histories (2009, background): “Just as delineating biogeographical regions aids conservation and monitoring efforts, recognizing general patterns in phylogeography can assist informed, spatially explicit management in marine systems (Lourie & Vincent, 2004).”