Capturing Semantic Similarity for Entity Linking with Convolutional Neural Networks
By Matthew Francis-Landau, Greg Durrett, Daniel Klein. 2016
181 citations recorded by the source corpus.
A key challenge in entity linking is making effective use of contextual information to disambiguate mentions that might refer to different entities in different contexts. We present a model that uses convolutional neural networks to capture semantic correspondence between a mention's context and a proposed target entity. These convolutional networks operate at multiple granularities to exploit various kinds of topic information, and their rich parameterization gives them the capacity to learn which n-grams characterize different topics. We combine these networks with a sparse linear model to achieve state-of-the-art performance on multiple entity linking datasets, outperforming the prior systems of Durrett and Klein (2014) and Nguyen et al. (2014).
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Natural Language Processing, Information Extraction
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Greg Durrett
- Mohit Bansal
- Luke S. Zettlemoyer
- Xiang Ren
- Hannaneh Hajishirzi
- Percy Liang
- Yejin Choi
- Sameer Singh
In Natural Language Processing
- Greg Durrett
- Mohit Bansal
- Luke S. Zettlemoyer
- Mirella Lapata
- Dan Roth
- Hannaneh Hajishirzi
- Xiang Ren
- Yejin Choi
In Information Extraction
- Greg Durrett
- Raymond J. Mooney
- Nazneen Rajani
- Dan Roth
- Nitish Gupta
- Yasumasa Onoe
- Thomas Hofmann
- Octavian-Eugen Ganea
Citations in the corpus
- Learning Dense Representations for Entity Retrieval (2019, neutral): “Most recent work on entity resolution has focused on training neural network models for the candidate reranking stage (Francis-Landau et al., 2016; Eshel et al., 2017; Yamada et al., 2017a; Gupta et al., 2017; Sil et al., 2018).”
- Deep Joint Entity Disambiguation with Local Neural Attention (2017, methodology): “For instance (Francis-Landau et al., 2016; He et al., 2013) use convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and stacked denoising auto-encoders, respectively, to learn representations of textual documents and canonical entity pages.”
- Neural Cross-Lingual Entity Linking (2017, methodology): “ ablation study, we notice that adding the LDC layer provides a boost to our model in both the datasets, Systems In-KB acc. % Hoffart et al. (2011) 82.5 Gupta et al. (2017) 82.9 He et al. (2013) 85.6 Francis-Landau et al. (2016) 85.5 Sil & Florian (2016) 86.2 Lazic et al. (2015) 86.4 Chisholm &a”
- Language Models as Knowledge Bases: On Entity Representations, Storage Capacity, and Paraphrased Queries (2020, background): “, 2011), neural EL (Francis-Landau et al., 2016; Kolitsas et al., 2018) Entity embeddings Text, entity mention spans Entity embeddings Joint embedding of entities and text (Yamada et al.”
- Stacking With Auxiliary Features (2016, methodology): “For ImageNet object detection in 2015, the top performing team used a deep residual net [He et al. , 2015] and several other teams deployed a version of faster R-CNN (Region based Convolutional Neural Networks) with selective search [ Ren et al. , 2015 ] .”
- Fine-Grained Entity Typing for Domain Independent Entity Linking (2019, methodology): “Recent approaches have used neural techniques (He et al., 2013; Sun et al., 2015; Francis-Landau et al., 2016), various joint models (Durrett and Klein, 2014; Nguyen et al.”
- Mention and Entity Description Co-Attention for Entity Disambiguation (2018, methodology): “From the table, we can see that even without the attention mechanism and the type information, the simple method LSTM-AVG outperforms FL-Single, which illustrates that our encoding method based on biLSTM is more effective in modeling mention contexts and entity descriptions.”
- Dense Text Retrieval Based on Pretrained Language Models: A Survey (2022, unknown): “models for effective candidate ranking [334]–[336].”
- Learning Dynamic Context Augmentation for Global Entity Linking (2019, methodology): “We apply the DCA process in two popular local models with different styles: the first is a neural attention model named ETHZ-Attn (Ganea and Hofmann, 2017), the other is the BerkeleyCNN (Francis-Landau et al., 2016) model which is made up of multiple convolutional neural networks (CNN).”
- Deep Learning for Entity Matching: A Design Space Exploration (2018, background): “For example, recent DL work [21, 74] proposed the use of hierarchical word embeddings to obtain representations that capture entity cooccurrences, Ganea et al.”
- Entity Linking via Joint Encoding of Types, Descriptions, and Context (2017, methodology): “Berkeley-CNN (Francis-Landau et al., 2016), that uses CNNs operating over different granularity of entity and mention contexts, also follows this training regime and trains separate models for each dataset.”
- Named Entity Disambiguation for Noisy Text (2017, methodology): “While convolutional neural networks (Sun et al., 2015; Francis-Landau et al., 2016) and probabilistic attention (Lazic et al., 2015) have been applied to the task, this is the first model to use RNNs and a neural attention model for NED.”