Habitat Matrix Effects on Pond Occupancy in Newts

By P. Joly, C. Miaud, Anthony Lehmann, O. Grolet. 2001

278 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3b2480534d877f2068afdd9a697fde2e80e95757

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Global and Planetary Change

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

MIGRATORY SUCCESS OF JUVENILES: A POTENTIAL CONSTRAINT ON CONNECTIVITY FOR POND‐BREEDING AMPHIBIANS (2004, background): “Joly et al. (2001) found that the abundance of newts (Triturus spp.) was positively correlated with the width of the noncultivated sector linking ponds to available forest within a 400 m radius of the pond.”
Movements of cactus bugs: Patch transfers, matrix resistance, and edge permeability (2004, background): “Matrix quality also affects the movements see Introduction and distribution patterns Aberg et al. 1995; Petit and Burel 1998; Joly et al. 2001; Vandermeer et al. 2001 of other species in subdivided habitat.Although both of our landscapes had 4% Opuntia cover, the differences in dispersal of C. vit”
Multi-scale effect of landscape processes and habitat quality on newt abundance: Implications for conservation (2006, methodology): “In newts, including T. helveticus , Joly et al. (2001) found similar results between site occupancy and the density of ponds, but they did not consider abundance.”
Modeling spatial distribution of amphibian populations: a GIS approach based on habitat matrix permeability (2002, methodology): “Indeed, Joly et al. (2001) have shown that half of the variables predicting newt occurrence were intrinsic to the pond, which could explain some discrepancies in the present results.”
Dynamics of a declining amphibian metapopulation: Survival, dispersal and the impact of climate (2010, background): “Although the great crested newt frequently exists in subdivided populations (e.g. Arntzen and Teunis, 1993; Miaud et al., 1993; Kupfer and Kneitz, 2000; Joly et al., 2001; Griffiths, 2004; Jehle et al., 2005; Meyer and Grosse, 2007), there have been no studies of long-term population dynamics within”
Impacts of habitat loss and restoration on amphibian populations (2009, background): “Despite of its fairly large distribution area, the crested newt has declined in most of its range countries (Edgar and Bird 2006), most obviously because of habitat degradation (Beebee 1997, Joly et al. 2001, Stumpel 2004, Skei et al. 2006).”
Improving generalized regression analysis for the spatial prediction of forest communities (2006, background): “…et al., 2004); submerged vegetation (Schmieder & Lehmann, 2004); fern diversity (Lehmann et al., 2002a; Zaniewski et al., 2002); amphibians (Joly et al., 2001; Ray et al., 2002); birds (Suarez-Seoane et al., 2002); butterflies (Luoto et al., 2006); aquatic invertebrates (Castella et al.,…”
Habitat availability for amphibians and extinction threat: a global analysis (2015, background): “Furthermore, open habitat amphibians often require small landscape elements that are difficult to capture in broad scale habitat maps (Joly et al., 2001; Mendenhall et al., 2011).”
Amphibian distribution in a traditionally managed rural landscape of Eastern Europe: Probing the effect of landscape composition (2010, background): “…usually benefit from forests, wetlands and grasslands (e.g., ‘‘rough pasture”, Scribner et al., 2001), while they suffer from cropland and urban areas (e.g., Joly et al., 2001; Scribner et al., 2001; Pellet et al., 2004; Van Buskirk, 2005; Denoël and Ficetola, 2008; Greenwald et al., 2009).”
Odonata, Amphibia and Environmental Characteristics in Motorway Stormwater Retention Ponds (Southern France) (2005, background): “Many papers highlighted the importance of a suitable habitat within and surrounding the pond for amphibians conservation (Hecnar & M Closkey, 1996 b; Bishop et al., 2000a; Joly et al., 2001; Beja & Alcazar, 2003).”
Beyond occurrence: Body condition and stress hormone as integrative indicators of habitat availability and fragmentation in the common toad (2011, background): “Other elements of landscape structure, such as configuration of the habitats and nature and configuration of the matrix, can influence population persistence, notably for animals with complex life cycle (Joly et al., 2001; Guerry and Hunter, 2002).”
Behavioral tradeoffs when dispersing across a patchy landscape (2005, background): “…is known to alter the effects of habitat isolation for animals as diverse as flea beetles (Aphthona sp. Jonsen et al. 2001), newts (Triturus sp. Joly et al. 2001) and hazel grouse (Bonasa bonasia Aberg et al. 1995); these observations imply that OIKOS 108:2 (2005) 227 dispersal behavior may be…”
LANDSCAPE CHARACTERISTICS INFLUENCE POND OCCUPANCY BY FROGS AFTER ACCOUNTING FOR DETECTABILITY (2005, result): “This agrees with amphibian spatial patterns observed in other systems (e.g., Marsh et al. 1999, Joly et al. 2001, Johnson and Semlitsch 2003) and could result from a metapopulation structure of green frogs.”
Landscape resistance to frog movements (2005, background): “…the establishment of roads or certain forestry and agricultural practices, reduce amphibian abundance, species richness, or genetic diversity (e.g., deMaynadier and Hunter 1995; Hitchings and Beebee 1998; Vos and Chardon 1998; Kolozsvary and Swihart 1999; Joly et al. 2001; Scribner et al. 2001).”