Contextual Influences on Marriage

By Benjamin R. Karney, Thomas N. Bradbury. 2005

157 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Demography, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3b113ed0c3a23827527f8e047fd6d72344e63a84

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Demography

1. Theodore F. Robles
2. H. T. Reis
3. Eli J. Finkel
4. Kathleen L. Carswell
5. Meghan M. McGinn
6. Richard B. Slatcher
7. C. Hui
8. Joseph M. Trombello

In Social Psychology

1. Richard B. Slatcher
2. Eli J. Finkel
3. Theodore F. Robles
4. H. T. Reis
5. Meghan M. McGinn
6. Joseph M. Trombello
7. Shelly L. Gable
8. Richard M. Ryan

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Theodore F. Robles
2. H. T. Reis
3. Eli J. Finkel
4. Kathleen L. Carswell
5. Meghan M. McGinn
6. Richard B. Slatcher
7. C. Hui
8. Joseph M. Trombello

Citations in the corpus

• Marital quality and health: A meta-analytic review (2013, background): “…priority on marriage, face a higher number of contextual stressors like chronic health problems, and experience especially challenging marital problems (i.e., substance use, infidelity) compared to middle-class counterparts (Conger & Elder, 1994; Fincham & Beach, 2010; Karney & Bradbury, 2005).”
• The Suffocation of Marriage: Climbing Mount Maslow Without Enough Oxygen (2014, background): “In addition, despite the elevated marital challenges confronting poor, uneducated, and racial minority Americans, members of such groups remain highly respectful of and optimistic about the institution (Karney & Bradbury, 2005; Lichter et al., 2004; Mauldon et al., 2002; Trail & Karney, 2012).”
• Steps toward the ripening of relationship science. (2007, background): “Karney and Bradbury (2005) provide an excellent example of why the Pasteur approach may be better suited to relationship science than the Edison approach.”