Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy.

By R. Barclay, J. Vicari, A. Doughty, J. Johanson, R. Greenlaw. New England Journal of Medicine, 2006

1,311 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

ACG Clinical Guidelines: Colorectal Cancer Screening 2021. (2021, background): “colonoscopists with relatively high from low ADR (147).”
Quality Indicators for Colonoscopy (2015, background): “APC reflects inspection over the entire length of the colon better than ADR and provides greater separation between endoscopists.(114) APC might lead to increased pathology costs if colonoscopists were expected or inclined to put each polyp in a different container to prove APC, but this problem cou”
Evaluating Test Strategies for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Decision Analysis for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (2008, background): “In addition, issues pertaining to the implementation of a screening program, including endoscopy capacity (33–35), professional qualification (36, 37), insurance coverage, shared decision making, and how to increase adherence with colorectal cancer screening (38), are important considerations for im”
Association of Colonoscopy and Death From Colorectal Cancer (2009, background): “Detection rates vary by endoscopist and by endoscope withdrawal time (20).”