Climbing Our Hills: A Beginning Conversation on the Comparison of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and Traditional Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
By Steven C. Hayes. 2008
126 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3afc2761eb164388bb0252392095f173f89c2c58
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- F. Ruiz
- Steven C. Hayes
- D. Barnes-Holmes
- K. Wilson
- J. P. Forsyth
- L. Fletcher
- Sean Hughes
- Stefan G. Hofmann
Citations in the corpus
- A review of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) empirical evidence: Correlational, experimental psychopathology, component and outcome studies. (2010, background): “…are noted, the controversies about the similarities between ACT and CBT (e. g. Arch & Craske, 2008; Hofmann & Asmundson, 2008) or between other types of therapies (e.g. Hofmann, 2008) can be considered from a broader perspective (see Hayes, 2008). references Andrew DH & Dulin PL (2007).”
- Contextual Behavioral Science: Creating a science more adequate to the challenge of the human condition (2012, background): “In previous writing on CBS (Hayes, 2008; Hayes, Levin, Plumb et al., in press; Hayes, Levin, Long et al., in press; Levin & Hayes, 2009; Vilardaga et al., 2009) several key aspects of system building have been delineated.”
- Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Anxiety Disorders: Three Case Studies Exemplifying a Unified Treatment Protocol (2009, background): “In terms of barriers, there continues to be a debate (e.g., Hayes, 2008; Hofmann & Asmundson, 2008) whether cognitions are causal factors for behaviors and feelings.”
- Acceptance and Commitment Therapy versus Traditional Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Current Empirical Evidence (2012, background): “However, as many authors have noted, it is not an easy task to define CBT because diverse theories, principles, models, and techniques can be categorized with this label (e.g., Craske, 2010; Hayes, 2008; Herbert & Forman, 2011; Levin & Hayes, 2011).”