Synaptic Depression and Cortical Gain Control
By L. F. Abbott, J. A. Varela, Kamal Sen, Sacha B. Nelson. 1997
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Matteo Carandini
- Wulfram Gerstner
- Yoshua Bengio
- Minjoon Kouh
- J. Urgen Schmidhuber
- Xiao-Jing Wang
- Giacomo Indiveri
- Karl J. Friston
Citations in the corpus
- Normalization as a canonical neural computation (2011, background): “In particular, a mechanism that could provide the appropriate non-linearity is synaptic depressio”
- A Synaptic Explanation of Suppression in Visual Cortex (2002, background): “The time constant of recovery was R 200 msec, intermediate between those reported for rapid depression in young animals (200–800 msec) (Abbott et al., 1997; Varela et al., 1997) and in adult animals (60–70 msec) (Thomson and Deuchars, 1997).”
- Short-term presynaptic plasticity. (2012, background): “In this way, a depressing synaptic connection responds transiently to changes in firing rate in a way that encodes percentage changes in firing rate (Abbott et al. 1997).”
- Somatosensory integration controlled by dynamic thalamocortical feed-forward inhibition. (2005, unknown): “crease in resource (such as vesicles) available after each spike followed by recovery with an exponential time constant (Abbott et al., 1997; Tsodyks and Markram, 1997).”
- Impact of active dendrites and structural plasticity on the memory capacity of neural tissue. (2001, result): “based on the recent activation history of the synapse, In a departure from the common view that memories the straightforward mapping of stable numerical weights are encoded in the overall connection strengths befrom a connectionist learning system onto synapses in tween neurons, our results suggest ”
- Neural Networks with Dynamic Synapses (1998, methodology): “The phenomenological formulation of Tsodyks and Markram (1996) and Abbott et al. (1997) can be generalized to describe facilitating synapses be-”
- Action and behavior: a free-energy formulation (2010, background): “In a perceptual setting, they may mediate attentional gain (cf., Abbott et al. 1997; Yu and Dayan 2005; Friston 2008).”
- An Organic Nanoparticle Transistor Behaving as a Biological Spiking Synapse (2009, background): “ G. Le Masson, S. Renaud-Le Masson, D. Debay, T. Bal, Nature 2002, 417, 854. [4] http://facets.kip.uni-heidelberg.de, 2005. [5] M. Boegerhausen, P. Suter, S.-C. Liu, Neural Computation 2003, 15, 331. [6] J. Borghetti, V. Derycke, S. Lenfant, P. Chenevier, A. Filoramo, M. Goffman, D. Vuillaume, J. P.”
- A Normalization Model of Multisensory Integration (2011, unknown): “This input non-linearity models response saturation in the sensory inputs 21 , which could be mediated via synaptic depression 22 or normalization within the unisensory pathways.”
- Suppression without inhibition in visual cortex. (2002, background): “…followed a similar 20 ms delay, at the low end of published esti-1997; Varela et al., 1997), shorter than the 1–2 s interval between our adapting stimuli and the subsequent probe mates for the time constant of recovery from synaptic depression (Abbott et al., 1997; Thomson and Deuchars,stimuli.”
- Neural processing of amplitude-modulated sounds. (2004, background): “s(t) [1 m sin (2 fmt)] sin (2 fct) (1)”