Sport Team Identification and Willingness to Consider Anonymous Acts of Hostile Aggression.

By D. Wann, G. Haynes, Bryan McLean, Paul Pullen. 2003

127 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Gender Studies, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3addb7b1991b8747524b5ff3394485f5957926a1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Shea M. Balish
2. M. Lombardo
3. R. Deaner

In Gender Studies

1. Shea M. Balish
2. Richard H. Smith
3. M. Lombardo
4. R. Deaner

In Social Psychology

1. David J. Y. Combs
2. Shea M. Balish
3. Richard H. Smith
4. M. Lombardo
5. R. Deaner
6. N. van de Ven
7. Amy J. C. Cuddy
8. Susan T. Fiske

Citations in the corpus

• Sex differences in sports interest and motivation: An evolutionary perspective. (2015, background): “For example, highly identified sports fans, male and female, report greater willingness to engage in aggression against rival players and coaches (Wann et al., 2003).”
• The joy of pain and the pain of joy: In-group identification predicts schadenfreude and gluckschmerz following rival groups’ fortunes (2015, background): “…indicated that highly identified fans were more likely to express the intention to commit purely hostile acts of aggression anonymously, meaning that their team did not stand to benefit from the acts; notably, however, this intention declined with the severity of the misdeed (Wann et al. 2003).”