Regional Development in China: States, Globalization and Inequality

By Yehua Dennis Wei. 2000

243 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3ad306353cdaf2136008b790da6ca53deb5109d6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Yehua Dennis Wei
2. G. Lin
3. Xinyue Ye
4. Zhiji Huang
5. Ran Tao
6. Fubing Su
7. Danlin Yu
8. Henry S. C. Yeung

Citations in the corpus

• Regional Development in China: Transitional Institutions, Embedded Globalization, and Hybrid Economies (2007, unknown): “As summarized by Wei (1999) and Fan et al. (2003), they argued for the dynamics and multi-scalar nature of regional inequality and the significance of institutions and regions in uneven development.”
• Development Zones, Foreign Investment, and Global City Formation in Shanghai (2005, background): “Shanghai’s development was accompanied by an increase in direct central government finances, technology improvement and special development loans from state banks, and local shares of revenue, providing massive financial resources for development (Wei 2000; Yusuf and Wu 2002).”
• The China model withering? Institutional roots of China’s local developmentalism (2017, background): “Different regional endowments also led to more diverse forms of developmentalism across the country, such as Sunan, Wenzhou and Pearl River models (Wei, 2000).”
• Urban land expansion under economic transition in China: A multi- level modeling analysis * (2015, background): “Through the process of marketization, development corporations are being transformed from socialist working units (danwei) to market-oriented, profit-seeking enterprises, seeking a variety of strategies to promote development (Wei, 2000).”
• Beyond the Sunan Model: Trajectory and Underlying Factors of Development in Kunshan, China (2002, unknown): “This conceptualization, built upon earlier publications (for example, Lin, 1997; Wei, 2000a; Wei and Fan, 2000), is particularly relevant to China, a transitional economy where the state still plays a significant role in development.”
• Restructuring Industrial Districts, Scaling Up Regional Development: A Study of the Wenzhou Model, China (2007, background): “…rise has been spearheaded by selected coastal localities, and the multifaceted development and transition have been driven by interplays of the state, global capital, and localities, empowered by the triple transition of decentralization, marketization, and globalization (Wei 1999, 2000).”
• Geospatial Analysis of Regional Development in China: The Case of Zhejiang Province and the Wenzhou Model (2005, methodology): “Reasons for this include historical legacy, national defense considerations, and regional autarky (Wei, 2000).”
• Geography, Economic Policy, and Regional Development in China (2002, unknown): “The rst sample consisted of 28 provinces that had complete income data for the 1952–98 period.”
• The State, Land System, and Land Development Processes in Contemporary China (2005, background): “The importance of the state in China’s urban and regional development has been widely underscored in the existing literature (Lo 1989; Pannell 1990; Chan 1992; Fan 1995, 1997; Lin 1999; Wei 2000; L. J. C. Ma 2002).”
• Spatiality of regional inequality (2015, unknown): “The role of the state has been particularly important to understand inequality in socialist countries (Wei, 2000).”