Two-Level Theories and Fuzzy-Set Analysis
By Gary Goertz, James Mahoney. 2005
125 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3ab950f0d9bc32a63b89ad69e551595325780b76
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Political Science and International Relations
In Sociology and Political Science
- Martino Maggetti
- Eva Thomann
- Carsten Q. Schneider
- Claudius Wagemann
- Bernard Grofman
- Jack S. Levy
- I. Rohlfing
- Michael Baumgartner
Citations in the corpus
- Standards of Good Practice in Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Fuzzy-Sets (2010, background): “Restriction: An alternative to treating some paths as more important than others is to make sense of the solution formula by moving up the ladder of generality (Sartori 1991, Goertz and Mahoney 2005).”
- Case Studies: Types, Designs, and Logics of Inference (2008, result): “Also Goertz and Mahoney (2005). have been surprising and consequently would not have significantly altered scholars’ prior assessments of the broader validity of those models.28 This discussion of most and least likely case study research designs, in conjunction with our earlier discussion of the…”
- Designing Research With Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA): Approaches, Challenges, and Tools (2020, background): “…be reduced, for example, through parsimonious explanatory frameworks based on cumulative knowledge (e.g., Thomann 2015); most similar system designs that hold contextual factors constant by using concept-structuring techniques (Goertz and Mahoney 2005) or two-step QCA (Schneider and Wagemann 2006).”
- IT MIGHT LOOK LIKE A REGRESSION EQUATION … BUT IT'S NOT! AN INTUITIVE APPROACH TO THE PRESENTATION OF QCA AND FS/QCA RESULTS (2006, background): “We would also emphasizes that the ordering does not necessarily have to be strict calendar time, but could also refer to ideas such as ‘causal distance to the outcome’, or ‘ontological relation between conditions’ (Gary Goertz & Mahoney 2005, Schneider & Wagemann 2006).”